Quality of sources vary greatly.
Rapid growth of technology is outpacing our ability to create standards and guidelines.
Other types of resources may be more appropriate.
Accuracy of Web Resources
Almost anyone can publish on the web.
Many resources not verified by editors or "fact checkers"
Information in linked web pages is not necessarily as reliable as the information on the original web page.
Web Standards to ensure accuracy are not fully developed.
Authority of Web Resources
Not always possible to determine authorship.
Even when authors name is given, his/her qualifications may not be provided.
Objectivity of Web Resources
Goals/aims of persons/groups presenting the information not stated clearly.
Web sometimes functions as a "virtual soapbox"; viewpoints often clearly biased.
Many web pages are marketing-oriented: distinction between information and advertising can become blurred.
Currency of Web Resources
Dates are not always included on web pages.
When included, dates may have various meanings:
- Date information was first written
- Date information was first placed on the web
- Date information was last revised
Coverage
Often difficult to determine depth and/or extent of coverage.
Search engines sometimes retrieve web pages out of context.
Purpose
It is not always possible to determine the purpose and/or the intended audience for specific web pages. This becomes confusing, especially when there is a blend of Information, Entertainment and Advertising.
Use of Hypertext Links
Quality of web pages linked to an original web page may vary. Each web page should therefore be evaluated independently.
Software Requirements
Additional software may be required to view certain web pages.
Browsers may alter the appearance of web pages.
Instability of web pages
Web pages may be moved or disappear without notice.
Thinking critically about World Wide Web Resources: Questions to reflect upon.... Information Quality ChecklistThese questions are based on traditional selection and evaluation criteria used by librarians to determine the quality of reference resources. To score, allow 1 point for each "yes" and 0 points for each "no" answer. There are 28 possible points.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|